Round Table

HAVE A QUESTION? ASK IT HERE: This page is provided for questions on Wolf Laurel issues that are of concern to you. The question will be displayed without identifying the sender. The webmaster reserves the right to not publish inappropriate comments and to edit submissions for clarification. Roads and Security issues should continue to be entered on the Work Request Form on the Roads and Security website (www.wolflaurelrms.com).

The response will be based upon the best information available to us at the time and in some cases, may represent only an opinion or a short answer to a more complex issue. We recommend that you do your own research before you take specific action based upon our answer.

Round Table Question Form - please send your request to wlpoaboard@gmail.com

For a printable compilation of Q&A on the Amenities and Village property purchase (click here).

Questions and Answers:

6/24/10
Q: Will Non-Equity members be allowed to attend "Monday Cookouts and Friday Nighters?" The draft of the By-Laws indicate that they would, but in the information session held last Monday, the 21st, it was stated that only Equity members would be eligible to participate.

A: The by-laws draft is in error and will be corrected in its final form. One must be an equity member to attend the Monday Cookouts and Friday Nighters. It is the equity members who will be purchasing the facility from BMDC.

6/23/10
Q: After reading the questions and answer section, is the $1900 due every year plus the dues or is the $1900 a one time expense?

A: The $1900 is a one time cost that will be redeemable upon sale of your property or transferable to the new owner at that time - your choice. The yearly cost is an amenities fee of $350 and WLPOA dues of $125. If you opted to pay the $5000 ($1900 is redeemable), it also is a one time cost, then the yearly cost would be the WLPOA dues of $125. There would not be an amenities fee for the lifetime of you or your spouse.

6/21/10-2

Q: Could you provide a copy of the current operating budget as well as a proposed operating budget for next year that would identify the sources of revenue to meet the operating budget? This information would be helpful in determining the likelihood of operating deficits.

A: This information will be presented on the website by July 1^st.

6/21/10-1

Q: If it were necessary to increase the size of the mortgage as the result of a shortfall in collections, would the amount of the annual membership dues that goes into the "Capital Development Fund" have to be adjusted upward from the presently proposed $75 or would the $75 amount remain the same and the length of the payoff time of the mortgage be extended?

A: There is presently no intent to increase the $75 annual contribution to the Capital Development Fund and that if it became necessary to increase the size of the mortgage, it would simply mean that the mortgage payoff time might be extended from the current estimate of approximately seven (7) years.

6/19/10

Q: We have (3) properties - 2 Houses. How many memberships do we have to purchase? If we are members, do our guests have the same benefits that we as members have?

A: You would need to purchase one equity membership that would then be attached to a single property. The other two properties will be brought into the program when you sell them and the new buyers join as equity members. Your house guests will be eligible to participate in the amenities activities just as they are able to at present. If one of the properties is used as a rental unit and you want the guests to have rights to the amenities, then an equity membership would be required for that property as well.

6/15/10

Q: 1-Will the Equity Membership $$ be returned if the deal is not completed? 2-If the deal is not completed and BMDC sells to another buyer, what type of development is permitted on that site (e.g. any zoning restrictions, covenants, etc.)? 3-The $1.1 million agreed price is described as a significant discount from appraised value. What is the appraised value and/or discount? 4- Is it possible to be an equity member but pay for amenities ($350-500?) as an annual decision?

A: Thank you for your questions and they are answered respectively as follows:

1. Yes, all funds are held in escrow and will be returned should the purchase not be completed.

2. The zoning of the property per Madison County is Resort Residential. It could be developed for many uses, including multifamily housing.

3. The appraised value of the assets we propose to acquire is $1,589,000 and was completed in December 2009.

4. A required annual fee will be necessary to insure a viable amenities program for all members. The greater the number of members involved increases the opportunity to hold or even lower the annual amenities fee. Please review all the questions received to date related to the property and amenities purchase (click here and use your browser back arrow to return to this page).

6/6/10-4

Q: For those property owners who become equity members, if they sell their property, the purchaser would be required to purchase an equity membership at the cost at that time (which could be considerably higher than the initial $1,900). I propose that equity members be able to transfer their ownership to a purchaser rather than the purchaser having to pay the higher future membership cost. If not, potential purchasers of equity members' properties would have a considerably higher cost than if they purchased a non-equity member's property (assuming they do not want to participate in the optional amenities program).

A: The paper submissions have been written as a redemption arrangement; however one can treat the arrangement as a transfer as well. Either way, as it best suits the individual, is acceptable to the WLPOA. One option prevents the fee from entering into property sale negotiations; a benefit to the seller and the other option allows the seller and buyer to negotiate. A bylaws revision will reflect the allowance of a maximum yearly 3% increase should it become necessary. It is the intention of the Board to hold the $1900 entry fee for several years.

6/6/10-3

Q: The amenities should certainly be a part of Wolf Laurel, but it is important that this be done in a way to prevent dividing our community into those who "have" access and those who do "not have" access as this will be an asset to all property owners. It appears that the WLPOA will be contributing almost 30% of the total cost; however, there is only one building which will be able to be utilized for the entire community. A suggestion would be to increase annual dues (as in any POA community) and have the amenities available to ALL property owners. Access to the tennis courts and pool may be an additional fee and higher dues, perhaps as a "tennis/swim membership" or "premier membership”, since the costs associated with maintenance and insurance are higher. The "Naming Rights" is an excellent way to raise initial funds and I commend the board for this avenue.

A: The WLPOA will be the sole purchaser and owner of the Village and amenities program. The setup will be a “pay as you go” arrangement for all members whether an equity member or non-equity member in that equity members get more because they pay more. Our current covenants do not require compulsory participation in the amenities as is done in many POA communities. Had our covenants been written differently, then your suggestion would be logical and have merit for consideration.

6/6/10-2

Q: In reading the "Plan" it seems that lot owners in The Preserve have the right to use the amenities in the Village. Will these owners have to pay membership and/or annual fees or dues?

A: Preserve lot owners do pay a substantial assessment and in theory part will go towards the development of their own amenities program. Although they have a deeded right to our amenities for 6 years, the loss of their amenities fees was negotiated into an up front lower price for the WLPOA. Yes, they can join the WLPOA, but not as equity members.

6/6/10-1

Q: I want to participate as an equity member, but will not be able to pay all at once. Is there some help available here?

A: The Board has authorized a down payment of $300 with the remainder due in twelve monthly payments of $140. This does involve a built in minimal finance charge necessary as the Board will have to borrow the money to accommodate the convenience.

6/5/10-2

Q: I am concerned of assessments and there not being any controls or limits.

A: The Board has addressed assessments in the proposed bylaw changes as follows:

1. Increases in the amenities operational budget will be prorated among its members and they are expected to be minimal.

2. Increases in capital expenses will be limited to $75 per year and if the aggregate is greater than $25000 per year than a 67% approval by equity members will be required.

6/5/10-1

Q: 1. Are there any provisions for use of stables? 2. Why not include stand alone building and lease back to BMDC for whatever term they desire? 3. Will Preserve owners pay the $350 fee? 4. What is the length of the "original term" for Preserve owners and BMDC? 5. Is the appraisal available for viewing? 6. Will inspections be done on pool and buildings prior to closing and will there be contingencies to take care of any discrepancies?

A: Thank you for your questions that will be answered respectively:

1. The Stables is a private business on land leased from BMDC. There should be no change in its use or availability as a result of the Village purchase.

2. As preconditions set by the seller, the BMDC office is not for sale. This benefits us as it reduces the amount of money we need to raise now.

3. Again, as a precondition of the sale, Preserve lots are privileged because of a previous deeded legal agreement within their covenants.

4. The original agreement was set for 6 years.

5. The appraisal was reviewed by WLPOA representatives.

6. The properties are being sold “as is”; however WLPOA members who are experienced contractors will be inspecting the facilities to determine maintenance issues that will become a budget line item.

6/4/10
Q: I would like to commit to the equity ownership, but not all my concerns have been answered. Is my check refundable?

A: It is important to have your commitment sooner than later to know where we are going with this endeavor. It has to be expected that not all issues have been answered to date including the proposed changes to the Bylaws. All funds are being placed into an escrow account and yes, your check can be returned at any point up to the July 15^th cut-off date.

6/2/10
Q: I wonder why there is a need to make the WLPOA capital fund payments after this year? I would think that all needed future funds should be raised through the sale of equity ownerships and annual amenities fees. I would think that the existing capital fund moneys would be moved into the amenities purchase and then you no longer charge this as part of the WLPOA dues. I am concerned that the WLPOA capital fund fees may quickly grow to pay an ever increasing part of the Amenities program. It appears that WLPOA capital fund dues will be used to reduce the amount that would otherwise be charged to the annual amenities fees and thus be a disincentive for purchase of lifetime memberships. I propose that no further capital fund allotments be charged or at least it be held to the current $50.

A: The CDF was established for a future purchase of a facility to call home for the WLPOA. Please refer to page 7 of the Plan for the Offering of Equity Memberships recently mailed to you, where it shows how the CDF will be used to pay off the mortgage for the barn (soon to be a Community Center), and that will take several years. Since all WLPOA members will be allowed to use the building, all will be contributing to its costs through the WLPOA dues. Future CDF collections and use thereof will be at the will of the WLPOA members. The costs of the Amenities program will be borne by the Amenities fee and not the CDF. There will be a distinction in what is considered capital development and what is the Amenities program.

5/18/10
Q: Re: The Village & Amenities Purchase; I applaud the POA board's decision. I know all the final details are coming but have a few questions: What will be the non-equity owner fee and how long can a person retain this status? I understand that the $1900 equity owner will still pay about $350/yr. What about those who have paid the amenities fee already for 2010 and now wish to become lifetime members? Will the 2010 fee also be required of other lifetime equity members who have not yet paid 2010?

A: To help clear up your questions let me offer the following:
     The WLPOA membership dues are $100 this year of which $50 goes into the Community Development Fund (CDF). Next year the dues will be $125 of which $75 will go into the CDF. The CDF money will help pay down the mortgage on the Community Building (barn) and usage of the Community Center will be available to all Equity, Equity Lifetime and non-equity members.
     The Amenities fee is currently $350 for any resident and $500 for rental units.   This season it is payable by all who choose to participate. Next year the Equity Lifetime members ($5000 level) will not be required to pay this fee, Equity members will pay the current fee and non-equity members will not have the option to participate. The Amenities fee is not fixed and is subject to the variability of operating expenses and total number of memberships.
     The Equity membership fee is a one time cost of $1900 until closing of the Village purchase after which the cost will most likely increase. These members will be responsible for the yearly Amenities fee and the WLPOA membership dues.
     The Equity Lifetime membership fee is a one time cost of $5000 and only available up to the closing of the Village purchase. These members will be responsible for the WLPOA membership dues but not the yearly Amenities fee. The Amenities-free benefit is transferrable to one’s surviving spouse.
     Both the Equity and Equity Lifetime memberships have lasting value in the form of a deed as a portion of the Village property and facilities. Additional details will be forwarded via first class mail before the end of the month.

10/17/09
Q: When we built our house, our builder mentioned something about restrictions on outdoor lighting. Is there a restriction on those big white bright lights? They are so bright and can be seen a long way away.

A: Your builder was correct. Please visit the R&S website under ARB Guidelines. Also, direct your question to the R&S board with details as necessary for any problems with lighting violations or restrictions.

6/19/09
Q: We are nearing the one-third mark on the months most WLPOA members are on the mountain with no Friday nighters. Would you post a request for a suitable rental house? We could easily pay 100.00 by collecting 2.00 or 3.00 per person. Volunteers for food serving could also clean up, or another volunteer could clean. We will need a driveway not too steep, a big sturdy deck, and nearby parking.

A: This is a good thought, and perhaps someone will come forward. The parking problem could be abated with car pooling.

3/4/09

Q: I understand that the amenities fee for this year has been decided upon and it will be appearing in the next TOB. I imagine it will also be brought up at today's POA meeting. However, can we get the info in advance via a posting to the WLPOA website? I enjoy checking the website daily for weather and updates. Thanks for doing a great job!

A: Hopefully you will receive your TOB very soon. Yes there is an article offering the Amenities program at $350 per property and $500 per rental unit. Invoices will be mailed out soon by the program director.

2/20/09

Q: Gate security has recently been more vocal to guests about no call from an owner letting them know about the guest's arrival. Just doing their job, I understand that perfectly. Yet the ski traffic is passed through without much fuss. Seems odd that the owner's guests are hassled but the ski traffic breezes through with no question. I understand the need for notification of guests but it seems a bit inequitable during ski season when total strangers are let in by the hundreds. A previous round table entry was expressing discontent about a direct access to the lodge. It would be much better than every skier going through the gate like it is now. The ski folks could still get to the rest of the development either way it is done, with a direct road they probably would never venture any further than the lodge parking lot while never passing through our gate. Please let them have that direct access road to the lodge and work on blocking off the roads going out of the lodge if possible. Even if you couldn't block off the roads, it would still be a huge improvement!

A: Please know that the ski slope existed long before the security gate and its guests have legal rights of access to the slope property (Wolf Ridge pays a fee for road use and the guards). Ski access is limited as explained on a different color entry tag, and the roving patrol does police their movement within WL; all part of the R&S responsibility to insure security with your money. Most property owners (as expressed in the R&S survey) are very comforted with our guards questions to visitors. Since guests are not restricted within WL, the extra questions are to insure the guests know where they are going and how to get there. As noted in a recent newspaper article, Wolf Laurel is not exempt from break-ins and other criminal activity. We should all be advocates of even more strict security measures for the protection of us all and our properties. The direct access road is only a concept at this time and to be constructed at the discretion of Wolf Ridge owners. Its development would solve some issues as you have mentioned and present new challenges as well. We will cross that bridge later, should it ever happen. Thank you for your comments that do express a valid concern.

2/13/09

Q: I am curious to know how security is maintained or improved with a bar code reader since the security gate sits in front of the ski resort access road. How are non-resident skiers monitored once they pass the main gate? Don't they have access to the entire resort by simply choosing to drive past the ski drive entry or going to the ski area then returning to the main road to travel throughout the resort? Am I missing something?
I believe there was a question posted previously voicing concern about a road from the outside ski lodge to the inside ski lodge thus giving anyone easy access to the resort. How would coming through our gate be different. I guess we register those who come through the gate but that doesn't necessarily mean they have their own license plates on the vehicle they are driving does it? Thanks.

A: There have been several articles already published (ref. TOB, POA minutes, letter inserts) addressing most of your concerns. As your question suggests, there are several exceptions to the norms that we will need to deal with, i.e. skiers, infrequent visitors, varying contractors, etc. The newly established roving patrol has already stopped and escorted out a hefty number of unauthorized vehicles on the mountain. Yes, there have been learning curve issues and there will be more to come; but we work out the problems, improve the system and move on.

2/9/09

Q: It is my understanding that the Amenities Program fees are currently being studied and they are seeking a formula that will be fair and equitable to all and yet cover the required expenses. They are seeking a balance between a low enough price that people won't drop out but high enough to cover expenses. They want to have a broad membership base in order to keep individual costs as low as possible. I understand they are considering $--- per year for everyone ........ This sounds reasonable to me but I mention this in case anyone wants to suggest other alternatives. Thanks to our POA Board and all the "crew" at Wolf Laurel!

A: Thanks for the kind comment. Your understanding is correct. I have edited your question since we have not been officially informed as to the actual fee to expect.

1/12/09

Q: Thanks to all the board and staff for doing such a good job of looking out for all of us. I really appreciate your efforts! May God bless you! I was unable to find any reference yet to the 2009 Amenities prices/changes. Can you inquire as to when we can expect to hear anything about that? Is there a separate website for amenities or should we rely on the WLPOA website to cover the Amenities news for them? I see the amenities calendar but that is all I find. Thanks again!

A: Thank you for the kind comments. We have not yet been informed as to the status or fees to expect for the 2009 amenity season, but expect to hear something soon. They do have their own page on the realty website, however the WLPOA site will have the same calendar information once it is available.

11/20/08

Q: Please use the link below and take a look at the drawings on the Scenic Wolf Resort website for their planned condominiums just below the welcome center and indoor pool. If you have not seen the plans, we are talking a place the magnitude of SugarTop at Sugar Mountain. For those not aware, SugarTop destroyed the view from the surrounding area and was so hideous that NC passed a law to prevent anything like it from ever being built again. If you can see the upper lodge from your Wolf Laurel home, this thing will dominate you view of the mountains and the ski area. Your view will be permanently altered if this building comes to fruition. The little quaint lodges and cabins are fine but this building would be a very large eyesore. Does this proposed structure violate the NC ridge law prohibiting buildings over 3 stories on or near the ridgeline? Is there any action we can take to stop it? http://www.scenicwolfresort.com/image_pages/phases/views_village_community.html

A: The topic was the subject of local TV news this past week. You have a valid concern and your presence at the December 1^st WLPOA meeting is requested where we will allow time for further discussion.

11/19/08-2

Q: Are there other winter folks out there that are annoyed that Wolf Ridge will be the only major ski area in NC not open after this weekend? Consistently the last to open and the first to close? If you are a resident and bought a season pass you sure are. App, Sugar, Beech, Cataloochee and Hawksnest will all be open this weekend but Wolf Ridge has turned out the lights and ceased snow making. Does anybody have an e-mail address to complain to? The health of the ski area (and therefore Scenic Wolf Resort) is important to our property values so we all should be concerned about the laid back, complacent attitude of the Wolf Ridge management. If you don't believe it, ask Ski Beech and the Beech Mountain community. They (finally) went through a major image overhaul after getting killed in the battle of public perception. Declining property values and the BM Chamber of Commerce intervened and convinced them that the culture needed to change and they needed to act like a value added ski resort to the town with customer service being a priority. If you don't think the perception of our little ski hill is important to your property value you need to think again. E-mail Wolf Ridge and tell them to keep up with their competition. The ski area is an amenity that benefits your property value whether you use it or not so write them at: info@skiwolfridgenc.com or marketing@skiwolfridgenc.com

A: It's a business married to mother nature, but we will allow time at the December 1^st WLPOA meeting for more detailed discussion.

11/19/08-1
Q: It might be nice for people who are off the mtn or people in Fla to know about the snow totals and how the roads are if they are coming that way and of course dates of snow on the mtn. Wolf Laurel is unique when it comes to the weather and snow and ice that comes it way. Just a suggestion?????

A: Good suggestion. I will create a space on the Home Page for weather events as they happen. For a detailed daily report, refer to the NOAA Wolf Laurel or Ray's Weather sites on our Related Links Page.

06/23/08
Q: Having just arrived back on the mountain, I am very disturbed to learn that the new owners of BMDC have apparently sold some acreage to the Scenic Wolf people that would now allow them to tie together the upper ski lodge and the old lower ski lodge with a new road now being built. If this is true, then skiers (and others!) will be able to drive from the top of the ski area down to the old ski lodge and therefore, into Wolf Laurel, without coming thru the front gate. There goes our security!! Our questions are as follows: Is the property owners association aware of this and secondly, since we have four representatives on the Roads and Security board, what is that board going to do about this situation in order to preserve the security of our gated community??

A: The topic has not been formally raised at any board meetings for either the WLPOA or R&S, but certainly it has been discussed in public by everyone that knows about it, including board members. To date, Mr. Williams and B&E Ventures have not confirmed the property transfer. The master plan for Wolf Ridge has been available to the public for many months, and it does show a potential breach of security for Wolf Laurel. There are options being discussed informally, should it actually happen. Perhaps your interest will bring the subject to the forefront for discussion.

4/06/08
Q: Will a detailed report of the Amenities closure issue be made available online? Our family spends the entire summer in WL primarily because of the amenities available to our children and guests. I cannot stress enough how devastating its closure would be to the existing community and the market value of property. Since purchasing at WL we have had several friends visit and also purchase homes here due in great part to the picturesque settings, amenities, and common grounds. Needless to say, it is heartbreaking for us to now feel we need to WARN people of Wolf Laurel ownership instead of praising it. Perhaps the new owners need to be reminded of the old marketing adage: "Do something nice for someone and they will tell 2 friends...do something BAD and they will tell everyone!"

A: Please review previous questions and answers on the amenities subject as well as the TOB President’s Message for Nov07, Feb08, and Apr08 where there is a paragraph in each issue discussing actions taken to date. Meeting minutes also contain comments on the amenities, and there will be a detailed report delivered at the July 28^th annual meeting.

3/20/08-2
Q: This is an additional question concerning the amenities. Did we ever receive a legal opinion from the attorney we retained to research our rights to use the amenities? What happens to the amenities if BMDC sets an outrageous price that we refuse to pay? Is there anything under NC law that requires the amount to be reasonable or based on the current market value? What is being done during this last year under the 5-year contract to make sure we can continue to use the amenities? Are negotiations on-going with BMDC? Thanks for the update.

A: Please see Round Table Q&A for 11/07/07, 2/08/08 and 3/19/08-1 to answer the bulk of your questions. Your questions will be discussed in detail at the April POA meeting. If possible please attend the meeting or send us a contact number.

3/20/08-1

Q: Is the WLPOA aware of the possibility that a lot of the homeowners money (25,000 more or less) might be spent on a Bar Code Entry at the front gate of Wolf Laurel with only the Road and Security Board making this decision? Shouldn't this be taken up at the annual meeting in July for a vote?

A: The WLPOA is certainly aware, since 4 members are on the R&S Board. There are numerous decisions on a variety of issues made throughout the year by both boards. That is the purpose of electing board members; to represent property owners. Each organization has its own budget, published minutes and open meetings where residents can express their opinions on how these funds are spent. The right to make these decisions is within the authority and discretion of R&S as per the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions.

3/19/08-2

Q: Since Willis Williams and BMDC have pulled down the websites that promote our wonderful resort and home rentals and he is threatening to close our amenities program next, what course of action does the POA suggest to homeowners and property owners take in order to preserve the value and benefits of owning a second home at Wolf Laurel Resort?

A: The POA is currently well over 600 members strong, and your question is of concern for a great many of its members, including those that have their one and only home at Wolf Laurel. The Board strongly suggests more active support from property owners. The synergy that can be achieved with more minds working together is essential to the solution to problems. Just recently, we have been informed the website is being reviewed for another rewrite, and that sounds favorable.

3/19/08-1
Q: The question from 2/8/08 asks about the threat to shut down the amenities in the village. What amenities is this question referring to and what happens after the 5th year? BMDC stands for?

A: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to clarify some points often taken for granted. The amenities include general use of the Village area to include the pool, tennis courts, pavilion, playground and trout pond, as well as the Angelico Ridge picnic site and nature trail. After this year the developer, Bald Mountain Development Corporation (BMDC), is open to charge whatever they think the market will tolerate for use of the aforementioned amenities.

3/04/08
Q: Does anyone know why www.wolflaurelresort.com no longer exists? It now sends you directly to wolf laurel preserve instead! That site had the best info available, I sent my friend an email to check us out and she said she couldn't find us.

A: The website URL belongs to the owners of BMDC, who have stated their primary interests are with sales within The Preserve. Information is available from other area realtors on homes and lots within the Wolf Laurel Resort. Many of these realtors' website links are available on this website on the Related Links page.

02/08/08

Q: What is the current status of the threat to shut down the amenities in the Village?

A: It is expected the amenities program will be the same this year as last, as it is the fifth year of the five year agreement. We are always open to dialog with BMDC on all issues regarding Wolf Laurel, and continue to explore and analyze various alternatives regarding the future use or ownership of the amenities.

01/15/08

Q: Do we receive a bill for the Roads & Security assessment and the HOA fee? I was expecting to have received something for 2008 by now. Thanks.

A: Yes, you will soon receive a billing for both in the same envelope. The invoices start to mail this week and are due March 1st.

01/07/08

Q: Just wondering why you haven't put out an alert that certin people on the mtn. should boil their water before drinking it??? There are several notices as of today (Jan. 7, 2008) at the guard gate listing roads that should boil their water before drinking since their has been a water shortage since last week, because of a leak somewhere on the mtn. You seem to be are more concerned with missing DOGS and BUMPS in the road than our own safety.

A: Alert notices are furnished by residents and are published as soon as they are known. As stated on the home page, the website is meant to be interactive. It is a free service for exchange of information to benefit us all. Coincidentally, the WLPOA Board is currently working with the water company for improved communications with the residents. We do know that every home (that they have a phone number for) was called directly. Fifteen streets were affected by the outage and 72 homes responded to the phone call network.

12/11/07

Q: Who would I contact to get information about combining two lots at Wolf Laurel?

A: Please contact Bob Burns at the Roads and Security office in the Village.

11/16/07

Q: In regards to the large sign at highway #23 advertising Wolf Laurel, several panels are coming off and one panel is missing. Is the WLPOA going to let the sign just fall apart?

A: The sign is not the property of WLPOA. We have no responsibility or authority to maintain the sign. This could be an issue for discussion at a POA meeting, however options are limited.

11/07/07

Q: How much WLPOA monies have been spent for legal fees concerning the status of the rights of the POA. Who is the Attorney and what is his opinion concerning this matter.

A: To date we have expended $2000 in professional fees to the Asheville firm McGuire Wood & Bissette. The firm was queried about the property owner's rights to public areas. We were answered: "If the right to use the said facilities was an inducement and part of the consideration for the purchase of the lots, the property owners' rights of use are irrevocable." A dozen court decisions in support of the opinion were also furnished.

10/23/07-2

Q: Why doesn't the website fit my computer screen?

A: Reset your screen resolution to 1024 by 768 pixels. To do this, go to control panel/display/Settings. Older computers may not have this ability.

10/23/07-1

Q: Where do I get a directory?

A: At the POA office next to the gatehouse. Call ahead (689-9229) or email (wlpoa@verizon.net) to insure someone will be there to serve you.

10/22/07-2

Q: When are property owner meetings scheduled?

A: Generally they are scheduled for the first Monday of every month at 10 am in the library. Check the website (www.wolflaurelpoa.com) since holidays may alter the usual schedule.

10/22/07-1

Q: Why aren't subscribed papers being delivered to the Club; it's still October?

A: The paper carrier said he was losing too many papers. Someone was taking more papers than they were entitled to. Subscribed papers are available at the gatehouse, and will be throughout the winter.

Return to Top